Adoption By the Numbers: Two Years Later, How Should the Florida Courts Navigate the “Not-So-New” Florida Summary Judgment Rule? – The Florida Bar
Building a sustainable employment practice
Supreme Court of the United States
Making Sense of Pretext: An Analysis of Evidentiary Requirements for Summary Judgment Litigants in the Fifth Circuit in Light of
Domenico Mastini v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Western Electric Company, Domenico Mastini v. New York Telephone Company, 369 F.2d 378, 2d Cir. (1966) | PDF | Appeal | Telephone
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Antitrust Division | Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Motions for Preliminary Injunction
Zenith Radio Corp. V. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. 494 F.Suppp. 1263 | American Journal of International Law | Cambridge Core
S:\US District Court\00 Orders For REB Review\E-Filed\M&O_renest_16-cv-00175_Troudt_msj_ord.wpd
Florida Supreme Court unveils a revamped summary judgment rule just in time for the May 1, 2021 effective date. - Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
1-99-cv-00055 Docket No. 121
FDCC Insights - Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel
Aguiar v. Webb Et Al - Document No. 97 | PDF | Discovery (Law) | Fair Use
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Aartie Restaurant Management, Inc. (1993) - PRESLAW
Insulin update: Price cuts ... for now - by Merrill Goozner
United States: Supreme Court - AMICI Curiae Brief Submitted by Australia, Canada, France, and the United Kingdom in Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., et al. v. Zenith Radio Corporation, et al. | International
United States: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Decision in Jackson v. People's Republic of China* | International Legal Materials | Cambridge Core
Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Epstein, 516 U.S. 367 (1996): Case Brief Summary - Quimbee
V. A1 TRANSPORT
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986): Case Brief Summary - Quimbee
